Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (18221)	2/4/1999 1:29:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Spidey, that's 75 times since - #reply-7357337 - you've said you're leaving. People will start to think you really mean it. We're going to miss this sort of hilarity - "...it is also true the judge was aware of mitchell's post concerning stevenson & the continuance for this witness was denied..."

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (18221)	2/4/1999 1:33:00 PM
From: Rico Staris	Respond to of 26163

betcha........................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B J never informed them that their request for Stevenson was DENIED! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . oH wELL they are on a "NEED TO KNOW BASIS" anyway.............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . THEY DON'T NEED TO KNOW THIS!<wink>.<wink>.....LMAO!

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (18221)	2/4/1999 1:51:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26163

ROFLMAO! OK, OK, we've had enough fun watching you twist in the wind. Time to set everyone straight... 1. The hearing was not "closed". Actually, the operative term here would be "sealed". If that were the case, such would be indicated in the Minutes given to the Docket Clerk. Such was not. 2. There were no "orders" given. Again, this would be in the Minutes and there are none. 3. The judge did make one request: he asked the defendants to submit a "Finding of Fact" by February 26th so that he can schedule future hearings. Once a hearing is scheduled, at that time the defendants will present their side. So, like we've been saying... it's just another waiting game. Should you believe me? You don't have to! Verify all this for yourself: call the Docket Clerk at 702-388-6351. Ask about case CVS9801247LDG(RLH). If you do call to hear the truth from the court, it will make reading what the Stooges will post in response to this message all the more entertaining! - Jeff

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (18221)	2/4/1999 2:05:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

rico, in fact the hearing yesterday was a 'closed session'. Sorry, Spidey, 'fraid not. this "watcher " was in fact asked to leave. Once again, sorry: LH in fact told a number of us (by PM) on Tuesday night that the "watcher" would be unable to attend the Wednesday session. We didn't expect him to be there. Much less to be thrown out. Or does Riley come into this somewhere? it is also true the judge was aware of mitchell's post concerning stevenson & the continuance for this witness was denied . Your "understanding" is imperfect, as always. If what you're pleased to call a "continuance" for the DTC witness was denied, then why wasn't he compelled to appear and testify, or be held in contempt of court? Trying to make this one fly is really very stupid, Spidey. But unsurprising. it appears the court is very aware of insider info from the defense attorneys being posted by this fbna group & my understanding is the judge was not to pleased. I see. But it's perfectly okay for Mikey to give YOU "information" to post. Sure. as for the other claims that shareholders were/are compensated in "free trading stock", those libelous claims were forwarded also to aznt legal team for defamation suit. A little late in the day for that, eh? Hogger already explained right here that you and he had received stock. You don't think anybody has trading records? NO ONE, NO LEGAL BODY, will concede 'bashers' any of the rights shareholders have (because of our 'investment'). You have GOT to be kidding!! In any court of law, my rights and yours are exactly equal. I've suggested to you earlier that you brush up on this legal stuff: after all YOU'RE the one who's being sued for $20 million by Zwebner, not me, bucko. (Pssssst!! Stooges!!! Reread this post!! He's lying to you AGAIN!! lolololololol, he just can't stop... Well, of course he has all that stock...)