SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (32122)2/4/1999 1:43:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
OK, the good here will lay low. How about the bad?



To: pezz who wrote (32122)2/4/1999 1:49:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Cool, I only note in passing, ironically or sarcastically as you choose, that Bill has claimed the side of angels. Whatever. In mild self defense, I also note in passing I've managed to mostly ignore the other primary practitioner of ad hominem ad nauseum on the side of angels.



To: pezz who wrote (32122)2/4/1999 4:04:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Hey, what's this kindler and gentler thread stuff everyone keeps talking about? Did I miss something? hahahaha JLA



To: pezz who wrote (32122)2/4/1999 4:26:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
I agree.

<<The new "kinder gentler Sanity thread" requires some understanding by us all.>>

Even if it is the champion of slut rights saying so. I don't think there is any need to go overboard with you lying, low life, whore mongering, gas bags. So, I for one would appreciate it if jla and dan would stop this silly name calling.

how about just a half cup of rice for a y2k bro? wadyasay..hmmm?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News