Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (32161)	2/4/1999 3:15:00 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 67261

Okay, but I think you are confusing me with someone else.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (32161)	2/4/1999 4:08:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I thought of a couple of instances you might have had vaguely in mind for you: 1.) I compared Daniel's rush to construe the story in the NYTimes as conspiratorial with McCarthyism. Since that has become a common term for reckless charges, especially of conspiratorial behavior, and that is what I was accusing him of, it was appropriate. 2.) I said that late term abortions had contributed to the actions of those girls who abandoned their babies to die at proms. Right or wrong, it was a fair speculation. I also may have called late term abortions infanticide (I can't remember), but if so it is simply that I believe it to be so. In any case, that's what I came up with, and neither is a straw man.