Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (32187)	2/4/1999 4:54:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

You really meant he wants NO proof, right?

To: Ish who wrote (32187)	2/4/1999 5:39:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Thank you for the name, Ish, indirect though your reply was. I don't normally read your posts if they're not directed at me. I asked for a name, not "proof". Broaddick's affidavit would seem to settle that other particular matter legally, unless/until Starr puts the screws on her. I hope you're enjoying your usual substantive dialog with your tag team buddies in the firehose unit squad. Sorry that the impeachment effort seems to be winding down with a whimper instead of a bang. 70-30, first bipartisan vote so far. Drudge's little offensive against Vernon and Blumenthal, faithfully echoed here as usual, doesn't seem to have paid off either. Poor Drudge seems to have cried wolf about 20 times too often.