Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (32200)	2/4/1999 7:45:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

You know what, Bill? I think you edited your original message after I replied to it. Since you pulled this "President Bush" cheesy high school debate crap on me before, I was watching for it. I notice I wrote George Bush in my original reply, Message 7658104 At any rate, GHWB is often still called President Bush, even as Starr is called Judge Starr. You think you've won points here, that's your right, big man. I'm sorry, I realize I earlier mistook where you actually started throwing insults today. I thought it was Message 7657981 but it was actually Message 7654424. Only 2 hours before I allegedly "started" it with Message 7657960. Oh, I made that little reference to "terms of endearment yesterday. That really troubled big tough guy Bill. Just for the record, for any poor innocent bystanders who might actually be interested, I'm tacking on my little file of the torrent of abuse from you the first time we went through the Bush deposition. Hope you're proud of it, Bill. Interestingly, you apparently hadn't caught on to your little "President Bush" cheesy high school debate trick just yet. You got me to call you a piece of garbage in there, a slip I regretted at the time. Now, I regret ever having had any exchange with you at all, and this is the end. I hold you beneath contempt. While you're busy pontificating on the conflicts in your troubled life, how about an answer to my question. Where and when did George Bush lie under oath? (Remember that hateful wild ranting accusatory post of yours?) Just wondering. Look, I'm not your shrink. Go rant to someone else. Just tell me when and where George Bush lied under oath, as you have alleged. So, you admit that you invented that stuff about Bush lying under oath. Is that what you're telling me? Are you telling this thread that you are a liar? Or are you telling this thread that you are ignorant? Nice tone. Again, take that to your shrink. What's this "I'll get back to you" stuff? You made a declarative statement and now you have to go back and look it up? Why don't you tell us what you meant by your statement that Bush lied under oath? Was it your lie or your ignorance that produced that bit of mythology? A person with integrity would have admitted he made up the statement, "and George Bush lied under oath." And an apology for being so blindly partisan that you lied to make a point would be in order. But liars beget liars, I guess. And people with no integrity are respected by the same. That explains your hateful existence. Have you no shame? Cease with the endless drivel and equivocating. You have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have lied when you said: "and Bush lied under oath." You can't even point to an instance where Bush was PUT UNDER OATH! Case closed. You lied. Admit it. Where is your integrity? And you complain about people attacking you? Who said this? You did. You're a real piece of work, liar. You lied about Bush lying under oath. You have no shame or integrity to admit it. And thank you for the "apology".