SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike Gordon who wrote (22015)2/4/1999 6:30:00 PM
From: billwot  Respond to of 77400
 
Mike For long term holders, buy more.

Well, I guess I know which strategy I need to follow!!

billwot



To: Mike Gordon who wrote (22015)2/4/1999 6:44:00 PM
From: James A. Shankland  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77400
 
Conservative:.....Sell Feb 99 110 Covered calls @ 2 7/8 or better.
Concerned:........Sell Feb 99 105 Covered Calls @ 5 or better.
Panicked:.........Sell Feb 99 100 Covered Calls @ 7 7/8 or better.

However, if CSCO recovers prior to Feb 20 and exceeds the strike price, you will loose [sic] your position.


You will not lose your position if you buy your calls back. If you really sold Feb99 105 calls for 5, and CSCO was at, say, 106 1/2 on Feb 19, why would you lose your position when you can buy your calls back for 1 5/8, earning a handy 3 3/8 profit? Of course, if CSCO goes way up in the next two weeks, it could be pretty expensive to close the short call position.

Also, there are tax issues around writing in-the-money covered calls against a stock, if you'd like long-term capital gain treatment on the stock. Covered call writing is a perfectly reasonable strategy, but I don't think of it as damage control. If you're a long-term CSCO holder, and would like to continue to be one, don't write covered calls unless your pockets are deep enough to cover a possibly substantial loss when closing your call position.

I do agree with you, though, that "all is not lost."<g>