Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Xenolix Technologies (XTCI) 'Ecstasy'(Formerly MGAU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Hall who wrote (2607)	2/4/1999 9:10:00 PM
From: Char	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

What third party? What pilot plant? You must be having a bad dream Tim. Go back to bed. Char

To: Tim Hall who wrote (2607)	2/4/1999 9:24:00 PM
From: W.F. Schwertley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

Tim, I see third party verification and/or plant start-up as the beginning of the end. So I would expect both to take place a LONG time from now (6 to 9 months maybe). In your earlier post, I thought you were inferring pilot plant start-up in 55 days. Personally, I will be amazed if this stock ever makes it over 2 bucks. But then again, NAXOF made it to over 10 bucks! WFS

To: Tim Hall who wrote (2607)	2/5/1999 4:43:00 PM
From: Dave Wahl	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5143

Tim; I'm confused about the 5 concentrate assays. Looks like the average of those concentrate assays is 0.5634 oz/ton Au. The final concentrates (34.846 pounds) look to be about a 14.35x concentration from the original 500 pound sample. I assume the 5 concentrate assay samples were split from the 34.846 pound final concentrate. So, if the assays are of the concentrates, wouldn't they have to be diluted ~14.35 times to get head ore grade? Or, were the 5 concentrate samples actually much higher than the 0.252 - 0.705 oz/ton Au stated and then back calculated to reflect head grade? Dave