Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (32263)	2/4/1999 9:50:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

No way. No how. No government funded abortions. Personally, I do not believe in them (any abortion) BUT, I don't believe in telling others they should feel the same AND as I've said before, I think government regulation in this area is sheer lunacy. JMHO. JLA

To: pezz who wrote (32263)	2/5/1999 4:09:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

I totally agree Pezz on govt funded abortions. They should be available depending on the features of the govt medical program we are speaking of. If the govt pays for childbirth, birth control, viagra, etc then they should pay for abortions. IMO the "no taxpayer $$ for murder" soundbyte you constantly hear from the anti-choice people is way off base (again). For example, I may not believe in the death penalty but my taxes pay for it. I may not believe I should have to pay for smoking related illnesses since smokers should have known better, and my taxes pay. Abortion is no different.... its a legal procedure and it should be paid for just like any other medical procedure, and the taxpayers will also save in the long run because of it. Michelle