SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Bema(Bgo) and Arizona Star -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Soileau who wrote (9830)2/4/1999 11:02:00 PM
From: Peter Neidhardt  Respond to of 10482
 
Ideally I think (many disagree) that BGO is a really good buyout opportunity right now. Now because of Refugio but because of their other great projects. A bigger company like Barrick, Placer or Battle Mountain could scoop up Bema at a good price and when gold recovers, these big guys have very nice properties to mine.

Good properties in the long-term for short-term low prices. Makes sense. Heard some people throw around Kinross. I don't think Kinross would buy Bema, at least not for Refugio.

Pete



To: John Soileau who wrote (9830)2/18/1999 5:08:00 PM
From: Philip Choy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10482
 
John, I have been trying to understand the economics of Cerro Cassale. From what I can gather from the news release so far, I have come up with the following;(I am no expert)

From one ton of rock:
0.71 gm x 74% recovery = 0.53 gm or 0.0168923 oz and
2000 lb x 0.26% x 89% recovery = 4.8 lbs
therefore, in 59.2 ton of rock, we will produce
1 oz Au and 284.15 lbs Cu

On the cost side:
cash cost/ton =$6.35 or $375.92 for 59.2 ton
capitol cost per oz = 182 - 79 = $103/oz
Total cost for 59.2 ton
375.92 + 103 = $478.92 or $8.09/ton

If cc is to be economical, we must have the following
0.0168923 x pog + 4.8 lb x p of Cu > 8.09
using 300 gold and .70 Cu
0.0168923 x 300 + 4.8 x .7 = 5.07 + 3.36 = 8.43 > 8.09

I think cc will turn out to be economical at current metal prices.
Regards.(there may be mistake in my assumption, I could be wrong)