Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (32276)	2/5/1999 3:09:00 AM
From: Jack Be Quick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<< I am sure it happened. That just makes it funnier. >> Really? Would you please provide a reference (to what you are sure happened) so that we all can get a good chuckle.

To: Neocon who wrote (32276)	2/5/1999 3:47:00 AM
From: Jack Be Quick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Neocon, << I am sure it happened. That just makes it funnier. >> I think that these folks might be a little closer to the truth of this story. Oddly enough, even when you stick to the true version it is still amusing. But maybe it does get funnier when the story is distorted and embellished solely to impugn Al Gore - I'm not sure. ont.com from Habitat for the Endangered Texas Eagle: We will never know whether Gore's reply was a result of "being-out-touch", incompetence in handling mountains of mail, or a way of not answering their constituent's closing question. But since Al Gore obviously never saw the Delgadillo letter nor his own form-letter reply, this reinforces that staffers are the gatekeepers of most communications. Keep that in mind in prefacing pro-rail communications with essentially anyone in the Whitehouse/Congress or Statehouse /Legislature or media.