SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bandit19 who wrote (95022)2/5/1999 1:18:00 AM
From: David Harker  Respond to of 176387
 
ALL: Cramer on Naz selloff (thanks Trufflette):

exchange2000.com

Someone Wanted Out
By James J. Cramer

2/4/99 4:23 PM ET

Hmmm, looks like the Nasdaq seller might have finished. In checking with every major
OTC desk every five minutes in the last hour, I did not find a single large seller. In fact,
after the Advanced Micro (AMD:NYSE) news came out, there were large buyers of Intel
(INTC:Nasdaq), as people recognized that AMD may be faltering in its next generation of
chips. In other words, the selling was all derivative, all stemming from a program
designed to sell all the favorite names that have propelled this advance.

You will hear people blame bonds for this selloff. That's just plain stupid. The drug stocks
were actually an oasis of "strength" and they trade with the bonds. You will hear people
blame the wild Internet shenanigans, the red rovers, as I now call them. But that's wrong
too. In fact, the Net wasn't that volatile.

Someone wanted out. He wanted out more than anybody wanted in. And when he was done,
he wanted to be sure he left his tire tracks all over the backs of anybody who tried to call
the bottom. Making things worse, camp followers piggy-backed, and what could have been
an orderly selloff just became a flat-out rout.

Me? I dodged the high explosive, but my ears are ringing. Have to see whether the same
selling comes back tomorrow. If it does, then the barrage will be dealt with and the prices
will be cheaper and more fetching. No, this is not the Silver Lining Department speaking
(like that Greed & Fear character that speaks in haughty third person over the weekends).
Today was hideous.

That said, I would have loved to have seen what it looked like without the high-explosive
program. Maybe tomorrow he comes with some white phosphorus. Stings, deadly, but
lacks the impact of what he threw at us today. I feel good that I held out to the bell to buy.
I feel bad that if this guy comes back, I am not done buying!!

(A word on "he": As I have said many times, I have no idea who did the selling, whether it
was one big account or two accounts. Or whatever. What I do know is that the selling was
concentrated in the futures, not the cash market, and the market makers never saw lots of
merchandise for sale. Just 10,000s and 15,000s from "away," which fits the pattern of
futures spill-off.)



To: Bandit19 who wrote (95022)2/5/1999 5:36:00 AM
From: Dorine Essey  Respond to of 176387
 
OT
>>Re: EGGS up 3 pts. After what happened Tuesday, I hesitate to quote CNBC on anything, but FWIW: CNBC reported rumor of possible buyout of EGGS by AMZN. <EOM>

Steve,
They also mentioned maybe MSFT.

Dorine