Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (48663)	2/5/1999 2:39:00 AM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572507

Ten, Let me generalize my question: Intel is using profits from non-Celeron business sectors to try and drive AMD out of business. Do you dispute this statement? Scumbria

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (48663)	2/5/1999 4:13:00 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572507

Ten, >>>And of course, some of Xeon's profits also has to go into software and OS support, guidance for those who build Xeon servers for a living, development towards increasing RAS for servers (™Tony Viola),...<<< Good grief, I can't stake any claim to a trademark for RAS! <g> Thanks anyway. The argument du Jour, on whether Intel is trying to put AMD out of business...I doubt that very much, if for no other reason than the fact that the DOJ and the FTC do exist. I guess the proponents of the predatory and bully adjectives would want Intel to hold back technology prowess, and let the little guy limp along to catch up. Analogy, Denver - Atlanta game: Elway has to throw his first three passes right at Atlanta DBs. AMD analogy: they'd drop them all anyway. Tony