Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (6050)	2/5/1999 9:33:00 AM
From: William Hunt	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21876

Zoltan --- Does it not seem strange that both analysts are from the same firm . Are they providing an objective view or pushing their own personal stock ? Analysts said investors were disappointed that Cisco did not declare a stock split, and that valuation was a lingering concern, but noted that the company remains healthy. ''While valuation may appear extended, Cisco remains the key beneficiary of internet infrastructure growth and transition to data-centric telecomunications networks,'' said Lehman analyst Tim Luke in a research brief. Lehman's Steven Levy, spurred by valuation concerns, insisted that Lucent, incontrast, was too pricey at 40-to-50 times 1999 earnings estimates, and renewed his neutral rating. ''Simply put, we do not think that investors should be paying a price-earnings multiple of forward 12 months earnings ... that significantly exceeds its forecasted sustainable earnings growth rate,'' he said. Lucent's rising accounts receivable levels at the end of the December quarter reinforce his concerns about valuation, he said. Also could be as I said yesterday they are "shaking the tree" to be able to buy in cheaper ? What are your thoughts ? BEST WISHES BILL PS I believed in both companies for the future ---will buy some CSCO if it goes below 100

To: Zoltan! who wrote (6050)	2/6/1999 1:14:00 PM
From: Dave	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21876

All: Analysts said investors were disappointed that Cisco did not declare a stock split, and that valuation was a lingering concern, but noted that the company remains healthy. When are these so-called gamblers, sorry I meant "investors", going to realize that a stock split does nothing for them. I think it is quite humorous that these "investors" equate a company's financial health to stock splits. Personally, i would rather have a company with solid management, a leader in their field, growing revenues and accelerating earnings. The analysts also were concerned with Cisco's valuation? Do these analysts believe that if Cisco split, Cisco would be at a fair valuation? If they (or anyone) believes that, God help us all. But hey, what do I know? dave