SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J. P. who wrote (42776)2/5/1999 9:31:00 AM
From: DavidG  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 53903
 
Hmmmm,,,,,

What a coincidence... Nationsbanc handling a couple million shares transaction for the Potato King. I hope no one is getting cynical about this.:-)

DavidG



To: J. P. who wrote (42776)2/5/1999 10:24:00 AM
From: Thomas G. Busillo  Respond to of 53903
 
J.P., FWIW I'm looking at different dates for those 144's:

20-Jan-99 SMITH GORDON C Planned Sale (144) 10,000 Common - $741,250
13-Jan-99 NICHOLSON THOMAS T Planned Sale (144) 50,000 Common - $3,525,000
12-Jan-99 BALDWIN DONALD D Planned Sale (144) 42,000 Common - $2,861,674
7-Jan-99 SIMPLOT JOHN R FOUNDATION INC Planned Sale (144) 42,500 Common - $2,735,223
7-Jan-99 DURCAN DERMOT M Planned Sale (144) 4,000 Common - $260,000
6-Jan-99 STOVER WILBUR G Planned Sale (144) 50,866 Common - $3,001,094

biz.yahoo.com

If you go back to the NYT piece last Sunday, you'll notice they gave
the date of the 10-Q as 1-5-99. This most likely was a harmless
error. However, you'll see something interesting happens when you
make the data of the 10-Q 1-5-99 and not 1-13-99 (the correct date).

There's a chance not a single share was actually sold out of the
above filings (I guess we'll see in the future) and jumping
to conclusions would be unfair. I think we'd all want
the same degree of fairness.

That said, IMHO, it is interesting that the Form 144's have been
piling up in the context of other events.

Good trading,

Tom