Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Xenolix Technologies (XTCI) 'Ecstasy'(Formerly MGAU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2629)	2/5/1999 9:44:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5143

Claude, <<You should ask the question why it is such ?>> <<there is a better alternative>> Disagree. It's bad enough for conventional miners to get funding, funding for desert dirts is an impossibility. They are between a rock an a hard place, proof gets funding, funding requires proof. We don't even have a definition for proof with these complex mineralizations. There is no question that investing in MGAU is very speculative and one should only use money they are willing to lose.

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2629)	2/5/1999 9:55:00 AM
From: Karl Zetmeir	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

How do you spell funding in a penny market? M A S S I V E D I L L U T I O N When your stock is in the dumpster ... along with all the others ... Money does not come your way easily ... that very money wants a very big piece of the pie. Mike has done it right ... get an income producing property to fund the rest. Bravo. I believe there are some warrants ... about 1MM ... due 3/1 for $1 that have gone in the money! Who knows ... we might even hit the $2 warrants by 6/1