SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J.B.C. who wrote (22518)2/5/1999 10:35:00 AM
From: brian h  Respond to of 152472
 
JBC,

Hey. A very to the point analysis of Tero's current and past comments. Thank you.

Too bad I will not be able to join you on the golf course after QCOM's shareholder's meeting the next couple of weeks. Being very busy lately. QCOM's share price do not go up enough to afford me the ticket is another reason. (gggg) May be next year.

I am glad that Dr. J. and his teams, especially Richard, quickly move to improve shareholder value. Way to go. Thanks.

Brian H.



To: J.B.C. who wrote (22518)2/5/1999 9:09:00 PM
From: Jim Lurgio  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
I felt I must respond to " Quite frankly you guys respond to Tero far more than necessary. Tero is a chemist with an opinion, NOTHING MORE!"

I would suggest his chemical opinion has added a lot to his assets " and nothing more" .

Is there anyone on this thread that can honestly state they are happy with the Q's performance Vs Nokia over the last 1 ,2 ,3, 4, or 5 years?

Things may change but will they ?



HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News