Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (32311)	2/5/1999 12:24:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I have been arguing the case against Clinton pretty strongly, I think, but the differences between the two cases are too extreme. I actually said that I thought the circumstances of the sex (with an intern in the work place, during the Paula Jones discovery, with extreme recklessness, etc.) were, in my mind, misdemeanors under the Constitution, and therefore impeachable. If you add in the perjury and obstruction, the case is overwhelming. But Monica was not a victim of rape, nor a little girl, nor was she killed, and so there are too many other factors to make the analogy apt. Therefore it is merely inflammatory, and you should withdraw it.