Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (48736)	2/5/1999 2:41:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573092

Re: "Survive? Sure Not Intel as we know it. Intel's overhead is gigantic compared to their competition. If Intel had to go head-to-head Celeron vs. K6-3, the company would collapse." That wasn't the question you asked. You asked if they could survive. In the real world, Intel doesn't have to go head to head Celeron vrs K6-3, in fact there isn't any K6-3 to go head to head with. AMD's statements yesterday seem to suggest the K6-3 is now slipping further as the AMD spokesman said the K6-3 will begin showing up in retail stores late Q1 or early Q2. I read slip to April. dailynews.yahoo.com "Allen said that AMD's K6-3 chip, which will compete directly with Intel's upcoming Pentium III chip, is on schedule and should be in systems on retail shelves at the end of the first quarter or the beginning of the second quarter." EP