Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RDM who wrote (48739)	2/5/1999 2:58:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572372

Re: "You are right, that in some sense that some of the results of the anti-trust laws may work against the consumer in the short term and result in higher prices. However, whether correct or not, the idea is that competition in the long run is most important for the sustained supply of low cost goods and the delivery of innovation to the consumer. " But competition is exactly what we have had and now we have a winner and a loser. What the AMDolts want is a cooperative affirmative action environment where if someone loses(AMD) it must be because someone else cheated(Intel). What other possible explanation can there be??? The playing field must be tilted to whatever extreme necessary for all results to come out even. After all isn't everyone entitled to success? Now what can be more fair that that? EP