Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : SATH - Shop At Home -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (372)	2/5/1999 8:31:00 PM
From: christopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1329

Anthony Anthony, your spelling started out so good tonight but these last few posts KABLOOY, same old Anthony...still trying to get people to send you their SS# to your fax machine I see like you did at post #299, I'll be interested to see what Yahoo says when I refer them to that post and ask them if I should be sending my SS# to strangers on the net... Ya know it's fairly simple...if you think the stock is going down by all means short it...ya know the short calls still ring in my ear..."short AOL at 40, they haven't made a dime and it's gonna crash" or "short AMZN at 50, it's a crummy book store that hasn't made a dime, how than that stay up" oh, the list is endless...true none the less when AOL was 40 they hadn't made a dime all all AMZN is is a bookstore that's way too high even at 50. Interesting story about AMZN they have 1.2% of the US book sales. If they had 100% of the US book sales and kept the current profit margin of 3.2% the stock would still be selling at 50x earnings. My legal position is as such...if someone nice asks me a question and I want to answer them I will...if a blithering idiot asks me a question and I don't want to answer them I don't... Chris

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (372)	2/5/1999 8:36:00 PM
From: Sharon L.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1329

Anthony..well, as far as I read, you accused christopher of something before he had any opportunity to respond. Second, as far as I am concerned, he has denied it. Third, my interpretation of redact is to publish, or write it up. To me, this mean to provide it. You will note that before a message is sent here, it says..publish.. Christopher said he would not put it up for all to see, nor in writing to you privately. So, I am wondering what you think christopher has to do?