SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (32437)2/6/1999 4:33:00 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Actually, I came at it from the angle of a guy whose loyalty to the group makes him oppose someone many people regard as a hero, so I wasn't even thinking of the "innuendo". Certainly I might have been, but then, if plausible inferences were enough to convict, we wouldn't have trials, would we?
As for how the more general comparison of Capone and Clinton got started, I believe the answer is simple--- many people believe he is guilty of worse things than this perjury and obstruction, but this is the only thing that could be taken to court, just as Capone was gotten on tax evasion.



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (32437)2/6/1999 7:58:00 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 67261
 
Hey Danny boy. You sign your tax returns and swear that they are accurate under the pains and penalties of perjury. Your signature is your verification that the information contained therein is true, accurate and complete. It IS perjury to file a false tax return along with other included offenses. JLA

BTW, just as filing a false affidavit would constitute perjury. Or verifying that a false affidavit was correct.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News