Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (32444)	2/6/1999 6:34:00 PM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Well; charges don't mean anything in America and thank God they don't. We are lucky not to live in a police state. You can charge anyone with anything and if some nut prosecutor gets a judge to hear the case; then you can have a trial. It all means NOTHING if the person is not convicted under our rule of law and in our system a person is innocent UNTIL convicted. No conviction; they are free of the charge. End of story. If you don't like our system of law; find another country and renounce you citizenship; I'm sure we in America will be better off for you doing this. In America; politics are such that you have a vote; if the people that lose do everything they can to abuse every system of government and society to try to win when they've lost; they IMO are the one's committing a crime. If the case was so convincing and so compelling; why is it that the Republican's keep losing more seats in the Congress and it looks like they are in big trouble for 2000; goodbye to the Republican House. The Republican's seem to have convinced a better than majority of the American people that they don't represent their interests and that is what elections are for; kick out the bums that don't do the will of the people. The Republican's don't care about polls; just watch how the next important poll turns out; the 2000 election; that is a nice poll to ignore.

To: Neocon who wrote (32444)	2/7/1999 3:26:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

On the other hand, there's all those New Testament verses that the inerrant good Christians around here don't have any truck with. Log in the eye, judge not, who vengeance belongs to, etc. Then there's always the terribly inconvenient camel passing through the eye of a needle business. I know you haven't argued a Christian line in general, but you did bring it up here. With the reform of Mr. Pilch there's no one left to present the good Christian theological line anymore. On that subject, I do like GHWB, he's shown a somewhat conventional interpretation of some of those verses. I imagine the camel one still presents difficulties for him, though. Will the true blue RR accept him? They never accepted his father, no matter how hard he tried.