Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (32459)	2/6/1999 10:54:00 AM
From: Bob Lao-Tse	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Please Daniel, you're the one who has called me and virtually every other person who thinks he should have been impeached a "Clinton-hater." If the local rules of substantive debate require one to be either a "Clinton-lover" or a "Clinton-hater" then that is clearly to some degree your fault. -BLT

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (32459)	2/6/1999 11:57:00 AM
From: greenspirit	Respond to of 67261

Daniel, anyone who spends 12 plus hours a day, day after day, month after month, defending the President on this thread is doing it for one of two reasons. 1. Either someone is paying for your posting or 2. you are in "love" with the President and first lady. :-) Since you have stated repeatedly that your posting is not related to pay, I'll let you figure out the rest. :-) The case made so far was exactly in logic and sequence of events. Obstruction of justice has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. I was glad to see the House prosecutors taking the approach regarding the job-payoff for lying in court. They must have been reading this thread. :-) This is where the real obstruction of justice occurred as well as bribery. It will be funny to see how the country club Senators squirm out of admitting guilt but not voting for impeachment. Michael