SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Henry Niman who wrote (27922)2/6/1999 3:23:00 PM
From: RXGOLF  Respond to of 32384
 
Yet another reason this weeks 2(two) approvals are so important (IMO)even though for possibly small target groups is its obvious food on the table while additional products are brought forward. Investor's Business Daily stated on Feb.1, 1999 "as the result of tight funding,some biotechs merged. Others sought funding from alternative sources. Still others cut back on research." "For the second straight year, biotech funding fell. It dropped nearly %21 to 7.7 billion in 1998 from 9.7 billion. This followed an 18% drop in 1997. The value of equity offerings fell by a third" "Registered follow-on offerings of public biotechs suffered the most-falling %77 to 351 million in 1998." The bottom line of the article was found in the final section, OUTLOOK. "Despite the industry's worries about access to capital, some executives and analyst remain confident." "Upside:The lack of funding will eliminate weak companies and free up cash for stronger products." "Downside:These are perilous times for biotechs dependant on the capital markets to finance efforts."

I hope Ligand will now be cash positive within a year, and our worries will be centered on safe and effective drugs, and not which capital market to next tap for a dime.

Greg



To: Henry Niman who wrote (27922)2/6/1999 3:34:00 PM
From: notyet  Respond to of 32384
 
LGND clinicals

At recap.com you can find the pipeline.
recap.com
It says that a PLA/NDA was filed in 98 for topical panretin in
acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Is this correct? Shouldn't it go 'panretin capsules'?