SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jach who wrote (22096)2/6/1999 1:21:00 PM
From: Claude  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 77397
 
Jach,

instead of pulling numbers out of your %**, why don't you give us a reason why the NAz will continue hurtling downward? Oh yeah I forgot - you said its going down because it went up! Wow some analysis there jach-o. Do you read anything or just right a bunch of crap all the time with no insight whatsoever? US productivity numbers are way up, consumer confidence is great, economy growing. This correction was supposedly caused by a fear of FED bias switching to tightening because of the economy heating up but nobody in the Fed has said anything of the like. All economic numbers are great, inflation has NOT reared its head yet, everyone is just having a hard time believing it can be this good.

And yes I'll say the PE is high but lets face it, as more and more individual investors get in to the market, they will be willing to take more risk with their money than a third party. I think we have to face that this is a new era for stocks and historical valuations will be less seen especially for high growth tech stocks. Unfortunately I think this will also result in more volatility.

.02 again
Claude (rhymes with TOAD)



To: jach who wrote (22096)2/6/1999 1:38:00 PM
From: Billiam57  Respond to of 77397
 
Well, since Cisco didn't split the stock, it must be a terrible investment...and that's why it is going down.



To: jach who wrote (22096)2/6/1999 3:14:00 PM
From: Fitz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77397
 
jach
Boy you must really be short........

Fitz



To: jach who wrote (22096)2/8/1999 1:45:00 PM
From: carl a. mehr  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 77397
 
jach is short *** jach sold short *** jach sold short ***

I say let him burn!

humble carl