Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dale J. who wrote (14216)	2/7/1999 2:25:00 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 64865

OT OT Dale- that's just a well thought out honest representation of the truth of this situation. Bravo! Yet I do think the Lewinsky testimony turns out to be SO corroborative of the Jones charges that allowing such testimony sure seems to have helped find the truth. I agree that some details should have been held back. Here was a gal so honest under the threat of prosecution that she told of oral/anal contact. She should have known she could have hid THAT one without consequence. Sure as hades THAT didn't have to be printed in the Starr report. Still, she needed to be asked about her legal relationship to resolve the case. Thanks to the saved stain, Jones got her satisfactory redemption after years of being renounced by the man holding the highest office of trust around. There is no doubt Clinton has received all too much misplaced trust in these matters. I Don't want Government legislating consensual sexuality- it's private and should remain so, but this was a Judicial proceeding- a difference that assuages my privacy concerns. As you otherwise stated, the guilty party is now held responsible. Thankfully. Dan