Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : SATH - Shop At Home -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bear Down who wrote (502)	2/7/1999 12:18:00 PM
From: Dusty Vestal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1329

Question Bear, if zecht's posts in regards to Anthony bother you so much, why do you even read them???? No offense, but it cracks me up when someone's posts really get to somebody, and if they didn't read them, they wouldn't have had a problem to begin with.. Dusty

To: Bear Down who wrote (502)	2/7/1999 12:31:00 PM
From: ztect	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1329

Bear... This is very simple High...Low .....At what price should the short be initiated to maximize the points covered.... No equivocation ...No obfuscation......Seems sloppy to short at 23.5 when the price may go to 40...and then establish another position to cover higher while waiting for the initial position to cover....Seems to make more sense to go long or day trade from 25 to 40 for 15 then short to 35 or 30 and cover another 5 or 10 for a total of 20 or 25...Seems a lot smarter than bragging about a point or two here or there.....Guess that's a little too complicated..... Well anyway.... Yet again you have the sanctimony to say that I'm unprofessional? Guess the NASD already decided that your buddy was already too unprofessional ......when they SUSPENDED and PENALIZED him.... nasdr.com Is this statement malicious or a lie? NO...I am only clearly stating what is already part of the public record and have provided the link for anyone else to review and see the facts as they are CLEARLY and UNEQUIVOCABLY stated in context. Anyway...you have no clue as to my motivations...if you took a look at the beginning of the GLOW thread...you'd see I also have gone after empty hypsters...and reported their transgressions....Also note I never had one penny in any stock whose participants hype I questioned.. If you took a look at the PINC thread and FBN thread, you'd see I have also questioned some of the vigilantism that occurs on these threads.....Though in respect to Janice, Jeff and other FBNers...I find most of their efforts sincere even if I disagree with some of their methods and conclusions...Most FBNers are thorough (though sometimes a bit one-sided) with their research. So again please spare me your SANCTIMONY..... eom. z