SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: George Coyne who wrote (32642)2/7/1999 7:31:00 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 67261
 
Well Dan finds everything that doesn't fit into his rather warped universe as "amusing" or "hateful" or whatever the derogatory term du jour is. JLA



To: George Coyne who wrote (32642)2/7/1999 8:01:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Oh, I understand Bob's point fine. The decline of the West is due to Clinton, we're stupid, and he's not. Just another view on history, George. I don't know what I'll do without Bobbo around to incessantly remind me what the only allowable point is. According to boston.com , it's not even clear if there's a simple majority in a Senate that gets the point.

The impeachment charges narrowly passed the House in December, largely along party lines. But the House managers have continually lost ground in the Senate, and several GOP senators said privately that as many as 15 Republicans may join all 45 Democrats in voting against the perjury charge.

That was Bobbo's only allowable point, right? Maybe the Senators all got confused with this convoluted perjury in not confessing perjury to the Grand Inquisitor count.

The obstruction allegation is considered the stronger of the two counts, but even that charge may not receive 50 votes, far fewer than the 67 required to remove a president.