Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Audio and Radio on the Internet- NAVR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jtech who wrote (6662)	2/8/1999 12:34:00 AM
From: FDHIII	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27722

you spelled his name wrong....EOM

To: jtech who wrote (6662)	2/8/1999 12:51:00 AM
From: zurdo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27722

Sorry, You don't qualify as an enemy...you are no threat to me...

To: jtech who wrote (6662)	2/8/1999 7:41:00 AM
From: Dave	Respond to of 27722

Jeff, The benchwarmers appreciate comments from both sides of the thread, however, you could approach with a little less combative style. I've seen you raise the same issues over and over, but never really say why you believe the 144 and the share dilution are a problem. The 144 is a positive sign that the director wants to make some money in the near future on some run-up. The share dilution is in the past and I really doubt that the actual float is that large since this baby moves like crazy the moment any type of volume comes in. What is moving this stock is the potential for upcoming news. You also state: <<Anyone who shorted Navr in the mid twenties is pretty happy by now>> I doubt that many people were able to short NAVR for the long hour it stayed in the mid-20's. How long ago was that anyway??? Dave