Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jack Be Quick who wrote (32685)	2/8/1999 2:00:00 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I don't know whether he could sue. It was the other stuff, about how an acquittal certified that someone was innocent, that I objected to. And I explained myself in the previous post, so I don't understand your confusion. Again--- a jury in the civil case found OJ guilty of wrongful death, even though he had been acquitted of murder, because the standard in a civil case is "preponderance of the evidence", not reasonable doubt, because certain things were admitted at trial that had been excluded previously, but mostly because they did not engage in jury nullification, as is widely believed of the first jury. We who are not even impaneled and under discipline are even freer to hold various opinions. But even more, a finding against removal in the Senate has no material bearing on the question of the Presidents legal liability, which still stands. Even Democrats have suggested that he be charged after leaving office. Now, is that sufficient, or should I repeat it one more time....