Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ZuluGroup.com (ZULU/ESVS)-Ecommerce & Internet Advertising -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (918)	2/8/1999 2:45:00 AM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2003

"What you'll find is that there is no downside of Zulu that is at all discussed within and among participants from other SI threads." Why would it be discussed on other threads? THIS is the place to discuss ZULU and ESVS. Not somewhere else. "Were Zulu as bad as the Negheads say it is, we would pick up on this from converstation on other threads" In fact, there was a casual mention of ZULU on another thread, and it caused you to break our posting moritorium to rip the poster a new a**hole. "Compare this with only substantiated and qualified information that is available from both SEC, company and trade journal sources. " Boy, is THAT the pot calling the kettle black. (Aside - geez, can somebody come up with a more PC alternative to that phrase...) Funny how little use you have for substantiated and qualified information. You'd rather make it up and spin, spin, spin.

To: PartyTime who wrote (918)	2/8/1999 3:22:00 AM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2003

PT, you wrote on YooHoo: "Forget about the typos. You still have to prove that these mysterious links are not linked You can't do that, can you? Ever hear of corporate espionage? Opposition research? Sabotage? Don't tell me you're a patent attorney whose not familiar with this kind of stuff. I'm curious to know why you think Zulu might be immune from either of these three things. Can you provide a reasonable and a rationale answer why none of this could EVER happen to poor little pennystock Zulu? " So, are you accusing simweb.com of some kind of spying? Or somebody else? Or are you accusing somebody of breaking into the ZuluMedia server and setting things up to make it appear they are bumbling? (But even I don't think this is evidence of bumbling. It's an easy to overlook mistake, since it is completely benign since it doesn't affect any normal part of the web site - it only affect snooping spinning fools...) Look, the sites ARE linked. I explained how they are linked. There is a redirect in ZuluMedia's server that redirects /images/ to the simweb.com site. This isn't some mysterious "portal" that gives simweb.com or anybody else some secret passageway into Zulu's server. The redirect just sends a header to your browser telling it "go here, instead" and it's your browser that accesses the simweb.com site. The simweb.com webmaster wasn't aware of this redirect, so it's almost certainly a mistake - something left over from the transition from the old simweb.com domain before somebody else registered it. (BTW, I e-mailed the simweb.com webmaster again, replying to his mail. I let him know that there is an individual making claims that there is some relationship between Zulumedia and simweb.com, and suggested that he let Zulumedia know about that when he contacts them. I'm sure that neither company wants false information of this nature to be spread.)