SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Pacific Internet Next HOT IPO? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CoffeePot who wrote (70)2/8/1999 11:35:00 AM
From: kennbill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 912
 
Maybe they should do a deal with DGIV.... now why do you single them out???



To: CoffeePot who wrote (70)2/8/1999 11:52:00 AM
From: Americo Burgos III  Respond to of 912
 
You're just everywhere aren't you Caffeine Kettle????????????

You DA MAN!



To: CoffeePot who wrote (70)2/8/1999 11:57:00 AM
From: Greg Jung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 912
 
I agree it is a spine-less article. ALL internet stocks are overvalued, even though we don't know how to value them. Especially with the lack of info available to the public upon IPO issuance, there's no way to judge. Maybe just use the company take on IPO, 2.5m x $15 = $38m, consider remaining shares $150m. How much
subscription capacity with current equipment. This is a simple business with straightforward entry requirements. What is it about -this- company that one should value equity at 3x premium? Greg



To: CoffeePot who wrote (70)2/8/1999 12:08:00 PM
From: Louis Riley  Respond to of 912
 
Go back to 1994 and search some archives for stories on AOL and you will find the same wrong arguments.



To: CoffeePot who wrote (70)2/8/1999 12:59:00 PM
From: Kimberly Lee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 912
 
I don't why she just quote MLCO as reference. MLCO's Cohen thought AMZN is worth only $50, that is, before the split.

Looks like someone shorted too much from 46 to 85 and looking to cover cheap. I bet Internet bulls like Mary Meeker will call this "over-valued" argument entirely baseless and unfounded, as it should be.