Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton Survey "Resign" Yes or NO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: del clark who wrote (661)	2/8/1999 2:27:00 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 697

I rest my case here...you have no evidence to offer nor discuss. Perjury is lying. Lying in court is not necessarily perjury- it always is perjury if it can affect the outcome of a case. The Federal Appeals court has ruled that the truths Clinton hid may have had a material effect on the original Jones case. His "lies" did affect her case, NO? YES!YES YES! face it. That's perjury. I suppose you think Jones could have received a penny without this evidence. As Byrd said, "...who's kidding who...?" The number who believe he lied was 80% recently. Most Americans don't realize that lying is perjury when it materially affects a court case- you among them I suspect. A child could see that the President was well aware that his lies could affect that case- and they did until this evidence came out! The fact that he knew withholding his truths could affect the case is key. It's perjury. Face it. Ok fine. I lied. Didn't change the facts, did it? Just the polls. Your case always did hinge on polls, not facts. You have nothing to offer but name calling without factual back-up. To imagine the President is innocent of trying to affect the Jones case in his favor requires lot's of fanciful logic twisting blind faith- thus stretching the bounds of credulity beyond repair. This is why so many know damn well he lied- without a doubt.