SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom C who wrote (18669)2/8/1999 7:18:00 PM
From: marcos  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 26163
 
Ooooh .... and here I was offended as a former Mouseketeer fan.

"Lastly, I'm a little offended as an Irish American of his sign off as "Mick". I feel this is a equivalent to terms such as "Injin" or "Redskin"."

Anybody making book on when Pugs replies to the esteemed counsel for Mr Zwebner?



To: Tom C who wrote (18669)2/8/1999 9:29:00 PM
From: Hogger  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 26163
 
Hey Tom,

FYI, Hogger is both Injun and Mick ... and after enduring some of the putdowns on this thread, I've rather junked the idea of Political Correctness. Although I can lay legitimate claim to being a Redskin AND Irish, it's nobodies business if the Irish is Orange or Green.

<< Right now I'm a little down on Hogger. It looks like he posted false information then berates others for believing his posts. I wonder if he posted truth but now finds he has to twist and turn to keep faith with his buddies. >>

I simply posted that I am an AZNT reseller and I also posted, next sentence, that I received stock - but nowhere did I even intimate that the two were connected in any manner. The question about becoming an FBN target is based on the fact that after checking out the Branch Dividians and a couple of other groups, it appears that in the US one can have a bible or one can have guns, but not both or they become a target of the ATF and others. Can an AZNT reseller also have stock without becoming a target? Further, I clarified my posts in a later posting that seems to have been ignored in this instance.

Simple enough .... except:

On this thread, certain posters will completely ignore (or sometimes the reverse) context or the possibility of double entendre or the possibility of intent that is not in line with their thinking ... and yes it has come from both sides.

If you had really done your checking on past posts, you would have easily identified the series of posts where I had enough and have referred to myself as an Injun and a Mick. And, do notice that I refer only to myself, and that Sir is my perogative and no one (I repeat NO ONE) has any right to discipline me for that.

Hogger Adm(Hon)
Injun/Mick/AntiPC



To: Tom C who wrote (18669)2/8/1999 10:06:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Respond to of 26163
 
Hogger's post certainly was ambiguous. Some people are as dumb as rocks.*

- Jeff

* Although it might appear that the second sentence referred to the subject of the first sentence, this was not meant to be the case. You see, while some people are as dumb as rocks, had I meant Hogger was dumb as a rock I'd have said "Some people, like Hogger, are as dumb as rocks." But I didn't say that. Therefore, if you inferred that I meant that Hogger was as dumb as a rock then that's totally of your own doing. But many do think that.**

** Although it might appear I am implying many people might think Hogger is as dumb as a rock -- even though I never meant to imply that in the first place (see note 1) -- I most certainly am not. You see, I meant that many people thought you thinking that was "of your own doing". But we all know he is.***

*** Although it might appear that... ahh forget it. (g)

- Jeff






To: Tom C who wrote (18669)2/8/1999 10:21:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Respond to of 26163
 
I wonder if he posted truth but now finds he has to twist and turn to keep faith with his buddies.

I wonder the same thing. I'm sure we'll find out eventually.