Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SFLK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andrew H who wrote (457)	2/8/1999 8:23:00 PM
From: steveK.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1591

Andrew-I agree.Also,the press release does emphasize that the SEC has not called this an "investigation".They have referred to it as an "informal inquiry".There's a big difference there.Everyone-read the release again,especially that paragraph.I don't believe there's evidence of wrongful intent and the SEC knows it.This will be over soon.Solid company here.JMHO.Great buying opportunity as well. Happy Returns- stevek.

To: Andrew H who wrote (457)	2/8/1999 11:00:00 PM
From: SgtPepper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1591

<<I doubt the company has done anything wrong.>> This is similar to the traffic cop who stops one out of 30 cars, all travelling at the same speed. Consider the following "projection", made after the SFLK/SEC news came out, by INSGY's CFO: "Based on the positive feedback from a number of potential customers who have reviewed Jene, Ambler said he is comfortable with projecting revenue of $40 million in 2000 and earnings of 85 cents a share." ( Message 7690916 ) Why does one company garner the wrath of the SEC prior to the announcement, while another blatant "85-mph" profit projection goes unchallenged?