Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (38907)	2/8/1999 11:31:00 PM
From: Impristine	Respond to of 164684

hail mary will save us, i am not worried, i am a believer, i just want us to revisit 80.....

To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (38907)	2/8/1999 11:33:00 PM
From: HG	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

WRONG! People have lost 45% of the 800% (could be more) they made..... big difference - don't you think ?

To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (38907)	2/8/1999 11:34:00 PM
From: KeepItSimple	Respond to of 164684

Hmm. Morgan Stanley's Mary Meeker was quoted today as saying that a 25% correction in the net stocks would be "healthy." And yet, she still rates all the net stocks she covers with a "strong buy" rating. So, let me get this straight. She is saying it would be "healthy" if anyone who listened to her stock picking advice lost 25% of their investment? Sound confusing? Nah. Just remember that sell-side analysts never issue a public sell recommendation on anything- including boston chicken which remained a strong buy until the day it went bankrupt. They are not allowed to issue public sell ratings because they would never get future secondary or IPO business. I wonder if Mary sleeps well at night?