Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Krowbar who wrote (30513)	2/9/1999 8:01:00 AM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

Del, while the pro-abortion lobby asserts that most partial birth abortions are done to protect the life of the mother, or because a baby is dead or has no brain, the anti-abortion lobby asserts that most of these procedures are done on perfectly viable fetuses, usually in the case of very young pregnant women who wait too late to get a first trimester abortion. In any event, partial birth abortions are the third trimester way of aborting a fetus. How do you feel about this issue when the fetus is perfectly healthy?

To: Krowbar who wrote (30513)	2/9/1999 11:19:00 PM
From: Kid Rock	Respond to of 108807

Del, They are not my rules and conditions. Those rules were decided by the courts, and I choose to go by court rulings. The alternative is anarchy. Somehow I do not believe you would say the same thing if the court ruled abortions illegal. I myself am troubled by the termination of any pregnancy, however in the case of severe deformities, missing brains/spines, I'm not sure that termination is wrong. But then who am I to define "severe"? Your question as to whether it is preferable to antesthetize a late term fetus before aborting it is pointless. Or am I missing something? Tom