SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (30514)2/9/1999 10:22:00 AM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
<<Well, what if NO ONE had access to guns? >>

Can you turn back the hands of time and uninvent them. That's the only way no one would have access to a gun.



To: Grainne who wrote (30514)2/9/1999 11:33:00 AM
From: Jacques Chitte  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
>Well, what if NO ONE had access to guns? The problem with arming a society to protect itself is that the sheer
prevalence of them feeds on itself, and the final result is what we have now, an enormously high death rate due
to guns.<

You must really love the sound of this myth because you are so tenacious in supporting it. None of the above is true.



To: Grainne who wrote (30514)2/9/1999 5:27:00 PM
From: James R. Barrett  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
>>"Well, what if NO ONE had access to guns?"<<

Well, what if NO ONE had access to crossbows?

Well, what if NO ONE had access to spears?

Well, what if NO ONE had access to swords?

Well, what if NO ONE had access to knives?

Well, what if NO ONE had access to clubs?

Well, what if NO ONE had access to rocks?

Well, what if NO ONE had access to Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream?

Jim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News