Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: N who wrote (32939)	2/9/1999 12:11:00 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 67261

It seems to me that most of Clinton's defenders want to abolish the new discovery rules for sexual-harassment litigation. These rules, championed by Clinton in 93, provide plaintiffs with the ability to ask defendants about prior sexual history with employees. They assume defendants will answer questions truthfully. Are you in that camp also?

To: N who wrote (32939)	2/9/1999 1:27:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

One more time.... <<..but in the end, it looks like illicit (ok secret, but it was consensual...so why was it illicit?)>> Bill clinton was accused of the crime (never fully prosecuted) of sexual harassment. During the course of the investigation of that crime, bill clinton lied (another crime) and obstructed the justice process (another crime). Bill clinton has never been charged with the illegally (illicit) having sex with monica lewinski. Having sex with monica is not illicit behavior. At least no charges were ever made suggesting that it was. The other behavior tagged as crimes however do represent illicit behavior.