Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : NP Energy Cp New -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: grantsi who wrote (14099)	2/9/1999 1:59:00 PM
From: taxgun	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 22810

if you speak the truth, you got nuttin' to worry about...if you make statements you dont know to be true, be careful jp

To: grantsi who wrote (14099)	2/9/1999 2:06:00 PM
From: Ken Sammut	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 22810

grantsi, Just my guess that the company wanted to remind old investors but just as importantly, tell new investors that NPEC is more than a telecom company as several of the releases will be focusing on telecom. I think it is great that the company is communicating with the shareholders. Ken

To: grantsi who wrote (14099)	2/9/1999 2:22:00 PM
From: J. Williams	Respond to of 22810

To ALL: Why is it that we defend our wrongs with more vigor than we do our rights!?!?!? He who protests so much has...........?? J.

To: grantsi who wrote (14099)	2/9/1999 3:49:00 PM
From: nmk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22810

TO ALL... I'm getting the feeling that my casual observation has lead to an odd discussion and a whole lot of misunderstanding. Let me clear up a few things... 1) I don't work for the company. I'm an investor, like many of you, who has been burned in stocks that have been slandered. 2) I wasn't implying that NPEC was gonna sue anybody. What I was saying, if you read my post, is that posting seems to be less frequent and of a more subdued nature on many sites and in many other stocks. 3) These lawsuits are not petty things, from what I understand. It isn't about negative posts, it's about out-right lies. I believe that one of the posters, who was shorting, said the CEO had been arrested for fraud and/or embezzlement and such. It wasn't true, but this guy claimed that and other things...It's about misinformation for profit not freedom of speech. Big difference. You can still say a company sucks the big rock, just don't say the CEO ran off with all the funds unless you can prove it! -) Sorry I scared you guys. Personally, I liked the old releases. Gave me asense of what's viable about this company...