SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pallisard who wrote (8106)2/9/1999 4:46:00 PM
From: Rich Wolf  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 27311
 
Me, too, Pallisard.

I want to say they came off faster than one every 10 seconds, too. Certainly faster than every 15 seconds. And was the video shoot made during operation at the most recent 'best' production speed?

Another topic: Not sure if I saw this posted, and it should be mentioned in the upcoming 10Q, but Lev updated the status of the lawsuits: Call it 'one down, one to go.' Lev said the one with Klochner was matched by a Valence counter-suit, and that he was never going to pay them for 'the piece of junk they delivered.' Conversely, the other lawsuit was settled (in the process), and Lev said the other party admitted they were in error and were in the process of delivering some additional software fixes, etc.

Thought those not in attendance might want to know this, if it hadn't been posted yet.



To: Pallisard who wrote (8106)2/9/1999 5:46:00 PM
From: lws  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
Hi, Pallisard,

I didn't see your post before posting my own, so I gather you caught something I missed. Can you say anything more about what you saw -- and about your overall reaction to the video? Thanks in advance.

Regards, lws

PS I am still putting together a post about my overall reaction to the meeting. I'll get a kick out of your comments. I am wondering what we are all thinking now a few days later. lws