SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (49120)2/9/1999 8:38:00 PM
From: RDM  Respond to of 1583374
 
DRDRAM vs SDRAM

Price and speed are what matters. No one knows as well what price
each will be let alone the speed. Competition and royalties are key factors that make it tough to judge.

Personally I would prefer as my future motherboard one that used two DIMM packages with 100 Mhz DRAM and provision for two more. Intially this will likely be dirt cheap by comparison to any "synchronous" alternative.

It is too soon to call which future technology might be cheaper. AMD is not going to drive the market. Intel seems to be trying to. Why it is not clear. I think they own 20% of Rambus. More importantly they have a special sweetheart deal with Rambus, I heard at the Hot Chips conference last summer, that allows them to build Rambus controllers while paying significantly less royalties than Intels controller competitors (AMD and others) to Rambus. The DRAM producers are not too keen on RAMBUS because it requires them to pay royalties on the RAM chips as well.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (49120)2/9/1999 8:43:00 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1583374
 
Ten,

Do yourself a favor and don't start conversing at the same gutter level as Paul Engel. I think that you are above that.

MMX proved that no matter how useless an Intel feature may be, it is still necessary to include it in your design. Otherwise, OEM's will not buy it. Intel FUD is powerful, no doubt.

Scumbria