Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Diaminds (Bulls Board) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tomato who wrote (444)	2/9/1999 9:09:00 PM
From: Rocket Red	Respond to of 1172

Ya I think there is something wrong with SI myself. The good one get jail and the bad ones go free.

To: Tomato who wrote (444)	2/9/1999 9:14:00 PM
From: kidl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1172

Fact or fiction?

To: Tomato who wrote (444)	2/9/1999 11:10:00 PM
From: LaFayette555	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1172

psssssst Tomato : teevee is NOT a HE she's a SHE.

To: Tomato who wrote (444)	2/10/1999 5:53:00 AM
From: maintenance	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1172

Why did Teevee go to jail? I can't see a reason. Cheers

To: Tomato who wrote (444)	2/10/1999 12:41:00 PM
From: chummer	Respond to of 1172

Tomato, Teevee may be in jail, but he is still with us. From stockwatch- Author: teevee -- Date:1999-02-10 07:54:40 Spence, Mineman also uses the name average joe. I suspect he is also registered here as the Doctor. At least someone on this thread correctly nailed him as the Doctor of proctology. He used to use the name Avorado. You might have noticed his ceaseless ignorant and abusive posts on SI-Winspear threads... He had me put in Jill jail, on SI for a week. The latest rebuttals I made were expunged from the thread as well. I guess he didn't like the truth...Luckily, everyone on SI now knows who and what he is(about). I see he has made himself a laughing stock here as well with the repetative and harassing nature of his posts....Responding to his various persona doesn't work..especially in a rational and civilized manner.....I suggest ignoring him. WillP, I think your analysis of the data in Winspear's various NR's is perhaps the best to date. You obviously have a mathematical background and presented your analysis with clarity. IMO, you are conservative in your analysis only because you don't have the geological background to filter the data in the proper context. I agree that the bulk sample results will surprise on the upside. I look forward to your next post. regards, teevee