SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (8139)2/10/1999 12:20:00 AM
From: Rich Wolf  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27311
 
Potential revenue

Agreed, it would be nice to have firmer estimates. Until they have the opportunity to run the line consistently in a continuous fashion, we are not likely to receive much guidance. But comments from Lev, reported by 'add,' others, and myself, should hint to you that yields are going to be much higher than FMK conservatively incorporated, in order to appeal to a middle ground.

In truth, we know that the company can make a profit. A big profit. Enough profit to support a MUCH higher share price, once the product officially sells and thereby indicates market acceptance.

We can sort out the factors of 3,5 or 10 times higher (by year end) at our leisure, after the event transpires. That's all the same, to me.

Myself, it's time to kick back and watch the story unfold.



To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (8139)2/10/1999 11:05:00 AM
From: P. Ramamoorthy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
Mr. Brubaker - Re.: (1) "did he say cells versus batteries?" question
(2) ...understand better is the potential revenue and earnings that could be generated by the company..."

Agree, both are valid issues. The company should clarify (1) in no time. For (2), need more cost/sales data that may not be available yet, especially the unit price and margin. Ram