Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : PSUN A new breakout at $30+! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mathon Dabasir who wrote (909)	2/10/1999 2:30:00 AM
From: Toby Zidle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1622

If Sam's Club would offer me $42 today for the right to put up their signs, I'd take it. At least the shareholders should be allowed to vote on it. As I understand the poison pill concept - anyone's poison pill - Sam's could not make a hostile offer because the PSUN board would declare it 'poison' and force Sam's to divest at $21 (half-price, for PSUN specifically). Personally, I think that has preempted my right to profit from my investment. Shouldn't the shareholders be able to hear Sam's Club out for a proxy vote? The only party protected here is the PSUN management.

To: Mathon Dabasir who wrote (909)	2/10/1999 7:04:00 PM
From: Duane L. Olson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1622

Sir Dabasir, I'll bet you don't think we read all the posts on this thread!! -- However, back when I owned more than 15 percent of the company NOBODY came and made me sell my shares --- I performed that self-mutilation all by myself!!. And the wounds won't heal until I get my stake back.. ((I promise to try to keep it under 15 percent, if you are going to get snooty about this))... Don't let the sand get into your computer the next couple of weeks .. TSO