Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ToySoldier who wrote (15758)	2/10/1999 8:52:00 AM
From: KM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

It's all about making money, baby.

To: ToySoldier who wrote (15758)	2/10/1999 9:25:00 AM
From: Ed Schultz	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 74651

Toy, Let me think hard about this. Sherlund is a very well respected and well known analyst which has paid is dues to get to where he is. You, on the otherhand, are just a moron. Furthermore, he has a proven track record of being right, and you, well, haven't been right yet about MSFT. Hmmmm...I think Ill stick with the pros! Ed

To: ToySoldier who wrote (15758)	2/10/1999 11:13:00 AM
From: RTev	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74651

In fairness to Sherlund, what he _said_ is that the trial doesn't have much affect on the share price now, but will have a significant when we get closer to the verdict. And as to your suggestion that Y2K issues are "one of the likely factors to the Windows2000 delay". I don't know, but I doubt it. Microsoft has been aware of and focused on Y2K issues for nearly two years, and started a major focus last year. I'm sure Y2K testing has been a significant component of NT5 development process for at least that long. Could some new-found glitch be contributing to the delay? Maybe, but not because the issue was ignored until now.

To: ToySoldier who wrote (15758)	2/10/1999 9:03:00 PM
From: DownSouth	Respond to of 74651

Toy, you are batting 500. You are 100% correct on you NOVL predictions and 100% wrong on your MSFT predictions. Why should we study your biased utterances now? Oh, by the way, how ya' doin', buddy?