Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich Wolf who wrote (8146)	2/10/1999 10:30:00 AM
From: DKR	Respond to of 27311

(New Patent):http://www.companysleuth.com/framewrap.cfm?LOC=www.companysleuth.com/modules/patents-full.cfm?number=5,869,207&Module=patents

To: Rich Wolf who wrote (8146)	2/10/1999 10:44:00 AM
From: Dennis V.	Respond to of 27311

Hi Rich, thanks for the calculations, couple of quick comments: we can probably produce a few more cellphone bicells than you indicated. Suggest about 5 times the number of laptop bicells vs. 3-4. However, looks like there are more bicells per cellphone cell than indicated in your last. Please note that cellphone models run 3.3-9.0 mm thickness . (The 43D cellphone cell is 8.6 mm thick).The laptop cell is 4.45 mm thick. I'm basing the above on the assumption that all data sheets furnished sofar are referencing "cells", not "batteries". That is, the numbered cellphone batteries are actually single cells. What do you think?