Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (33213)	2/10/1999 12:31:00 PM
From: miraje	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Don't you think most of us would prefer a good impeachment on things like Chinese money being used to buy influence (did anyone say bribery?) in order to get sensitive technology. This is what Bob Barr wanted to impeach Bill on. And if that was what he had been impeached for, and it were proven, then the country would overwhelmingly demand his removal from office. But you take what you can get, when you have difficulty making the other cases. Which is exactly why the GOP is going to be taken behind the woodshed and spanked in the next election. The framers knew the difference between bribery and treason and consensual sex. 2/3 of American voters also know the difference. The GOP "took what it could get" and it's going to get taken good as a consequence.

To: Neocon who wrote (33213)	3/17/1999 6:29:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

The Dictator Speaks nytimes.com Too bad I missed this one when it came out, Neocon, on the subject of my "ludicrous" references to Singapore. I'll just have to embarrass myself further on the subject. Well known commie William Safire meets the great man Lee Yuan Kew here. Old China hand Bush didn't restrict his kowtowing to China, it appears. In blurbing the memoirs of the dictator of Singapore, President George Bush gushed: "Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew is one of the brightest, ablest men I have ever met." Baroness Thatcher: "He was never wrong." Henry Kissinger: "One of the seminal figures of Asia." Despite this adulation, a vituperative right-wing calumniator regularly denounces Lee for using lapdog judges to silence internal opposition and intimidate journalists. "'You call me a dictator," Senior Minister Lee said when we recently met at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. "You are entitled to call me whatever you like, but that doesn't make me one . . .do I need to be a dictator when I can win, hands down?" He brought up the example of Chee Soon Juan, 36, a neuropsychologist who dared to run for Parliament. After being fired from his job and losing his home, Dr. Chee was arrested for breaching the Public Entertainment Act by trying to make a speech. "There was this little fuss about a dissident," said the dictator, "who said, 'I'm going to speak at Raffles Place,' which is our business center, without a permit. So why didn't we let him speak? "I said the law has been on the statutes for the last 50 years. If everybody just turns up at a busy junction at lunchtime and makes a speech and runs around . . . there would be pandemonium. We are not that kind of society." Joseph Nye, head of Harvard's Kennedy School, suggested that Singapore set aside a place like London's old Hyde Park Corner where people gathered to hear speakers sound off freely. Lee promises: "We'll probably do it." That'll be the day. The dissident Chee was fined the equivalent of $800, refused to pay, spent a week in jail and faces further harassment. I asked: if not worried about opposition, why fine him at all? "Because the laws are there, and he has complied with those laws for the last eight years. Since 1992 he has been campaigning. And now, because he has lost, and lost badly in an open, free election, one to one against one of our candidates, he's had exposure on television, which was disastrous for him because he was caught out lying and fibbing and fabricating evidence on a health care paper. . . . So he gets a big splash in the Western press, because they want to beat me up. It's all right; it doesn't bother me." When dissidents say "liar," they are driven into exile; obviously a free press bothers him plenty. "We do not own the [Singapore] press, as they do in Malaysia. Nobody is allowed to own more than 3 percent of the shares. The management of the press is in the hands of our four big banks." "And that makes all of them terrified of crossing you." "No. That makes them having a vested interest in stability and growth, and they support parties that will bring about stability and growth." Result: 80 of the 83 seats in Parliament are locked up by Lee's party. Why does he fear political contests? "There are seven or eight parties that contested the last elections. They lost because they cannot produce an alternative more attractive to the electorate than us. Look: Nobody in his right mind believes that we rigged elections." As one of the legion not in his right mind, I asked: How about free labor unions? "Nothing to stop them from forming independent labor unions. But they can't succeed, because the unions who are with us produce more results." About nepotism: "Would your son be Deputy Prime Minister if he were not your son?" He snaps: "If he were not my son, he would be the Prime Minister. He came up faster than any of the others, but I told him it would do him no good." The scion must await his time. The determinedly irreplaceable Lee Kuan Yew is the world's most intelligent, and to some most likable, despot. In our hour's talk, he offered insights about China to be reported in a future column, unless my publisher gets sued, bankrupted, jailed and flayed with a cane in the meantime. "You are not a silly man and I don't give you silly answers," the Senior Minister said in parting. I'll put all those answers on the Internet when I figure out how.