Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas L Nielsen who wrote (33220)	2/10/1999 12:45:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I have repeatedly said that if the prosecutors have done anything wrong they should be sanctioned. But I believe that in all trials, substantive evidence should not be excluded because of misconduct by the police or prosecutor, so I am perfectly consistent in saying that even if the charges were proven, they are irrelevant.

To: Thomas L Nielsen who wrote (33220)	2/10/1999 1:39:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Respond to of 67261

Thomas, I understand your point, of course. The "substantive debate" here is ridiculous, and I'm out of here when the final vote comes down. No predictions on that, either, in terms of the final vote, but the result is a foregone conclusion. I hope the smugly moral superior types keep pushing the "you're stupid, and we're not" all the way up to the next election, but that's their choice. I expect that at least in this august forum, the baying hounds of politics as a blood sport will not be phased in the least.