Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (33271)	2/10/1999 2:32:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Again, you ignored the thrust of my post. In any case, he could easily have settled, and the PR damage of ridding himself of "a nuisance suit" would have been minimal. Looks like the Republicans are now wishing that he had settled it, so that they would not have been able to drag this thing on to themselves! Sometimes, we say -- "whatever happens, happens for the good!" I sure am glad that Clinton didn't settle that lawsuit! <G>

To: Neocon who wrote (33271)	2/10/1999 2:51:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Oh, please. You butt in about how "ludicrous" my response to some hothead talking about caning in Singapore is. When I respond with substantiation, I'm ignoring the thrust of your post. "He could have easily settled" is quite hypothetical, how in the world do you know? Paula Jones could have easily settled for the same money, too, before all this crap broke. You can thrust anyway you want, Neocon. Enjoy your smug moral superiority, along with your pompous certainty about the correctness of your conservative dogma. We're stupid, immoral, "incorrect", and you're not. There's not much point in arguing, I'll be leaving this field to the hounds of politics as a blood sport soon enough.